Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Transportation has been one of the big issues for humankind. Some people prefer to use public transportation and some of them prefer to use their self-car. In my view, having a good public transportation can encourage people to use public vehicles instead of their self-car. Therefore, investigating on railways is a good way to improve public transportation and persuading people to use it.

First of all, spending more money on railroads can make less traffic. On the other hand, using self-car by each person make heavy traffic. Governments should find ways to improve the quality of countries. One of the best ways to increase the quality of life in each city is light traffic. For instance, my husband has been in the related situation two years before. He had two job offer in two different cities. One of them was in San Marcos California and one of them was in Bentonville Arkansas. He has confused in that period of time. Finally he talked to someone who has lived in both states. He told my husband: California's cities are crazy, but Arkansas has some small cities and there is no traffic. My husband is a traffic freak, so he decided to accept the job offer in Arkansas.

Second of all, expanding the public transportation can help to have a clear sky and non polluted air for breathing. Clean air is a really important advantage in each region. Government can make it easy by paying more attention to the railroads and spend more money to expand the railways.

Finally, the rate of murder by accident is going to decrease by more using of public transportation. Nowadays people are going to buy new models cars and use the highest speed in roads. It can make the roads dangerous.

To sum up, government can have a big effect on humans' life by planning to spend the budget in a right way and in public transportation.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'offer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'offers'.
Suggestion: offers
...uation two years before. He had two job offer in two different cities. One of them wa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ville Arkansas. He has confused in that period of time. Finally he talked to someone who has l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...He has confused in that period of time. Finally he talked to someone who has lived in b...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...up, government can have a big effect on humans life by planning to spend the budget in...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ns life by planning to spend the budget in a right way and in public transportation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'first of all', 'in my view', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254237288136 0.229887763892 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.177966101695 0.158761421928 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090395480226 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0169491525424 0.046263068375 37% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0480225988701 0.0685040099705 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110169491525 0.118717715034 93% => OK
Participles: 0.045197740113 0.0351676179071 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81364121675 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.045197740113 0.0309702414327 146% => OK
Particles: 0.00282485875706 0.00188951952338 150% => OK
Determiners: 0.0875706214689 0.0887237588012 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0197740112994 0.0209618222197 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00282485875706 0.0139019557991 20% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1839.0 2387.08602151 77% => OK
No of words: 321.0 408.028673835 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72897196262 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327102803738 0.338922669872 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218068535826 0.251872472559 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165109034268 0.174417080927 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109034267913 0.112833075102 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81364121675 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498442367601 0.524397521467 95% => OK
Word variations: 50.6711020525 59.2087087015 86% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.5909090909 20.5533526081 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6224546339 48.84282405 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5909090909 120.699889404 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5909090909 20.5533526081 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.590909090909 0.644075263715 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 36.3977626735 45.7405998639 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.68604651163 1.45489161554 116% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949885638091 0.300154397459 32% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141434350828 0.103427244359 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.107006443421 0.0752933317313 142% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.4854987245 0.497263757937 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18946038915 0.151897553556 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381021181443 0.114077575197 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316079847732 0.0781384742642 40% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.278900339727 0.336927656856 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0442242971026 0.067059652881 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722446110619 0.210909579961 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166301338504 0.0618886996521 27% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.