If you are required to give feedbacks about your classmates/colleagues, would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first?
In today's progressive and competitive world we live in, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of the people's influence have on each other. There are different ideas when it comes to whether it is better to give positive comments on other's work or personalities at first or negative comments. Some people believe that the first comments should be positive. On the other hand, some people hold the idea that it's more influential to leave negative comments in advance. I think the first group carries more weight, and these are my justifications.
First, being positive at first is essential to forge a secure relationship, which allows the person to make negative comments later. To clarify, if you start with negative comments, it will cast considerable doubt on your good intentions. Colleagues and classmates need time to believe that you try to improve them. If you leave negative comments before they have enough time to trust you, they would probably become negligible to all of your sayings. It is necessary to be positive before the relationship becomes close and persuade others that your goal is to help and you are not trying to belittle them.
Second, giving positive comments will boost their self-esteem, making them more creative and aware of their strong points. To shed light on this, there are so many people is suffering from low self-esteem. They don't know about their positive features and never experienced being acknowledged by their classmates, boss, or colleagues. By doing so, we can encourage them to believe in themselves. Personally, I think people already know their drawbacks, and it is low energy and lack of self-confidence that prevent them from getting rid of their unwanted qualities. Therefore, kindly cherishing them for their positive characteristics would help them become more successful than they were before.
Third, human beings love to be appreciated, and just a few of them are open to being criticized. We have to spend a lot of time realizing whether the person is ready for hearing bad things about their function. Some people are touchy and take just a tiny amount of criticizing of their work as personal. Therefore, it is better to start with positive points, and through this time, gain an understanding of the person's openness to negative comments.
By considering the reasons mentioned above, I think it is better to start with positive comments. Because by doing so, the bond between people will strengthen, the self-esteem of the person will boost, and we gain enough knowledge about person and sync in out comments with their character.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... is better to give positive comments on others work or personalities at first or negat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...is suffering from low self-esteem. They dont know about their positive features and ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...this time, gain an understanding of the persons openness to negative comments. By co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, i think, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0626450116 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8179931846 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522041763341 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3422552531 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5909090909 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271776162807 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800206272444 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757806765664 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145244414309 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112669098477 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.