As far as I concern, People have been debating the pros and cons of the statement that hiring experienced worker with high pay rate. Experience already defines less chances to get failure as you have all kind of experiences in the past. From my personal view point, I strongly agree with the hiring higher salary experienced worker for the following two rationales.
To begin with, Experienced person solve the all problems easily. Person with different experiences knows solutions for the all problems. Only negative concerns is employer has to spend higher amount of money to hire all rounder experienced person. I will take my own personal example to illustrate this. I have my own physical therapy clinic. I hired new graduate in the past when I opened the clinic to save some of my money. New graduate worked very hard, but because of lack of experience, people never liked him. After few years, I hired another therapist who has 15 years experience in the field. That experienced therapist had an idea how to resolve physical therapy related problems and how to crack audits and also, that person helps me to build up my patient's level and eventually, I had so much profit.
The another reason, Hiring experienced worker means less chances to make mistakes. As experienced person have broad aspect of knowledge and have few years of experience will reduce the chance of failure. Increase chances of success rate. To illustrate this, One of my colleague is very experienced with all the machines and computers. One time, My ultrasound machine was not functioning and I had four patients waiting for the machine. I tried it and I mad every functions worse as I never had any experience in that field. I called my friend and he showed me how to fix that machine over the phone in one attempt without making any mistake. My friend saved my carrier with experience and knowledge.
Some people conflict my sentence by saying that you can hire less experienced person with less salary. That's very true. I think both have their own pros and cons. According to recent survey released by the federal research, More that two-thirds employers believe to hire experienced workers even though they have to pay higher salary.
All in all, Hiring of experienced workers need to be considered positively in terms of promoting good business. It not just means to find the solutions easily, but also means for less chances to make mistakes. In general, I wholeheartedly believe that the very first thing we should do now is to admit the importance of experienced people as the key to open the door of our bleak future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...gh pay rate. Experience already defines less chances to get failure as you have all ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... I have my own physical therapy clinic. I hired new graduate in the past when I o...
^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...reason, Hiring experienced worker means less chances to make mistakes. As experience...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ried it and I mad every functions worse as I never had any experience in that fiel...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ss experienced person with less salary. Thats very true. I think both have their own ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...he solutions easily, but also means for less chances to make mistakes. In general, I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, third, as to, i think, in general, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86995515695 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63714496605 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.533850727 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4444444444 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5185185185 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07407407407 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161024837093 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430422146882 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563065578295 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110719559869 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642570497718 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.