Imagine you work for a company that has money in its budget to help its employees improve their work.
1) To improve the quality of technology (computers and printers) that employee use.
2) To redesign the offices to comfortable space for employees to work and have a meeting in there.
There have been pros and cons regarding the argument that a company should invest to help employees improve their work.
While both sides may have their own reasons to support their argument, I would strongly agree that a company should invest to help employees improve their work.
There are several reasons and examples as follows.
To start with, improving the quality of technology (computers and printers) that employee use to work for a company that has money in its budget to help its employees improve their work is a great way for employee to broaden perspectives on the real world.
This is attributed to the fact that improving the quality of technology (computers and printers) that employees use to work for a company that has money in its budget to help its employees improve their work offers opportunities for them to become growing into adulthood and building a strong character.
Over the decades, today’s rat-race society has been evolving and changing at a surprising speed with such a hectic lifestyle.
Therefore, employees are hard-pressed for time and feel depressed or drained by the increasing amount of work.
However, in this respect, many of employees would like to expand and widen their intellectual horizons through improving the quality of technology (computers and printers) thanks to company investment, which makes them think differently about multiple things.
This is because improving the quality of technology (computers and printers) that employee use to work for a company that has money in its budget to help its employees improve their work allows them to look outside the box and approach things in a different way.
Thus, this proves that a company should invest to help employees improve their work.
All things considered, it is my belief that my argument regarding this topic has been effectively and precisely delivered with the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...gy computers and printers that employee use to work for a company that has money in...
^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...y computers and printers that employees use to work for a company that has money in...
^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...gy computers and printers that employee use to work for a company that has money in...
^^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ook outside the box and approach things in a different way. Thus, this proves that a company shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21103896104 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67807157871 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451298701299 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6577389329 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.909090909 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.53405017921 243% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.663470243432 0.236089414692 281% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296304988259 0.076458572812 388% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.251710491801 0.0737576698707 341% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296304988259 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.251710491801 0.0645574589148 390% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.