This is the argument about which infrastructure governments should put priority on. It is undeniable that public transportation system is crucial as a basic infrastructure, I believe that internet access is important as well. Therefore, I prefer to put money on the internet. I have two reasons and I will explore my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the internet has played a pivotal role in our societies because of its convenience. Take an example from our everyday lives. When we want to buy an air conditioner, we search on the internet to compare products from various cooperations. The internet enables us to read how other people who used the product felt it. This is an advantage that we cannot have when we visit in-person retailers. We can even buy the preferred one through virtual stores. Drawing from this example, we are too much dependent on the internet on numerous occasions. Thus we should prioritize supporting the underlying system of the internet.
Another reason is that the internet is not merely convenient but also helpful in emergent situations. My personal experience is a compelling example. When my friends and I were driving in a forest, we got lost in a forest after sunset. We got panicked so we did not hit upon a mere idea of making a phone call or locate myself using the GPS service. However, it was a fortunate that we could bring ourselves to look up on the internet and know what to do when lost in a forest. Luckily enough, we could get out of the forest by making a call to the nearest police and having police officers come. This experience tells us how crucial the internet is in emergency cases.
For these two reasons, the internet serves as a foundation of our digitized society. The lack or a defect of the internet system could lead to an unimaginable accident. Therefore, I support the idea that government should spend money on the improvement of the internet access rather than that of public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... on the internet on numerous occasions. Thus we should prioritize supporting the und...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84955752212 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90929343742 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3607588867 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.7272727273 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207020873579 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608849759487 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102699135178 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161791514584 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132722486184 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.