It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Do you agree or disagree?

Networking is a natural thing in our life as it happens in most of the cases automatically during our daily life. Therefore for me meeting new people is imperative in order to develop as a successful individual.

It is believed that human beings are tend to change as they grow up. In certain period of time old friends’ prefences or goals will not coincide and everyone goes to different directions following their aims. From my personal experience to be honest I had only one real friend and he is still my friend. We used to go out together like to the partys or to the special events. So we did not planned our weekend without discussing how to enjoy it. And at the moment we live in different countries and communicate rarely. As a normal and social person obviously I have to make new friends.

As far as I am concerned people have to stick to their goals not to the friends. Of course it does not mean that we should cut our relationships with old fellows completely but at the same time we do not have to strive to adjust our aims just to be together with them. During our life we study then we start and continue our professional experience in different locations and naturally we meet new people likely with some of them we share the same interests,goals so we begin to be in friendship. It is vital and natural process in society which plays crucial role for the growth of a person in every aspect of life.

To sum up I believe that making new friends is important for everyone.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...es automatically during our daily life. Therefore for me meeting new people is imperative...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
... It is believed that human beings are tend to change as they grow up. In certain p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d to change as they grow up. In certain period of time old friends’ prefences or goals will no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'plan'
Suggestion: plan
...or to the special events. So we did not planned our weekend without discussing how to e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bviously I have to make new friends. As far as I am concerned people have to st...
^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , goals
...some of them we share the same interests,goals so we begin to be in friendship. It is ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, therefore, of course, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 274.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47810218978 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66589539213 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4727096685 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6428571429 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129228500068 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506565694795 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751469155791 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115606333541 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993117317332 0.0645574589148 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.