Friendship has been respected in all years by the human being and all psychologists recommends that every person should have some friends. On the other hand, there is a famous debate in any culture about the importance of old friends in comparison with new ones. Because of some reasons which has been listed in following I prefer to keep my old buddies than to look for new relations in my entire life.
First of all, friendship is a complex progress which people try to match their habits and moralities in that. Making new friends means we should introduce ourselves again to new individuals and try to know each other which provides many problems during this process whereas our previous fellows are familiar with our interests and behaviors. This means during establishing new relationships we would have many unknown matters added to our complicated life. For example, a religious person has some inhibitions and he or she should explain them in new connections and this is a tough energy consuming work for everyone.
Secondly, all social texts says trust is the most valuable outcome of connectivity with our close humans and produces many necessary senses like happiness and safety. Spending time with the persons who we know many years create a suitable atmosphere that we can share our privacy in a safe environment in it. For instance, we all do not like to express our politic perspectives to untrusted persons and being in new relations all the time force us to hide our different beliefs which is a stressful mood for anybody.
In addition, our modern lifestyle includes many challenges and it is necessary to have some best friends to get help frequently in several situations like business or personal subjects. In this statuses persons from past years would probably assist very helpfully in formidable phenomena in contradiction with recent ones. An academic research has demonstrated that people who have old friends are more prosperous in society because they get assistance in some unwanted events of their life. For example, undoubtedly any person has faced with a financial need in order to marry or extend his or her work and in this case we can surely count on former friends more.
In conclusion, popular philosophers have given advice that having few deep friendships is more efficient than holding shallow numerous ones. It shows our ancestors have emphasized the vitality of this view many years ago and we can not neglect that easily.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 88
- Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends, whereas many now suffer from loneliness and health problems. What are the cause of this and what are some solutions 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative development? 89
- tpo19 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
... like business or personal subjects. In this statuses persons from past years would ...
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'academic research'.
Suggestion: Academic research
...mena in contradiction with recent ones. An academic research has demonstrated that people who have o...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02919708029 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70259903319 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557177615572 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2036801424 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1875 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180372847555 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585606878736 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612092473432 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102227508611 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752426080804 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.