It is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving endangered animals
By and large, it is established beyond doubt with the dawn of human civilizations, humans are exploiting the natural resources and making use of the land. With the passage of time, resources are exhausted because of overpopulation and other developments in societies. In this regard, human's survival depends on the finding new resources. There are different schools of thoughts among scholars on whether it is critical to use land for human needs, or to save endangered species. If I were asked, I would agree with the notion that humans needs are more important than animals needs.In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion that using land for human's need will alleviate the problem of overpopulation, also it will fulfill the residential needs. Evidentally, if land is used for protecting endangered animals then humans will be deprived of their basic needs. It is crystal clear that a place to live and grow is a right of everyone. By the way of illustration, with the advancement in the society, my city, Lahore population is increasing day by day. My city dwellers are having residentials problems as most of the places in my city is getting over crowded. These is no place to build a new building. Mostly people are buliding stories above the buildings .As a result, the quality of life is declined too because people do not have facility to breath in the fresh air because of all the buildings. Therefore, If new land is explored for housing it will accomodate large number of people and solve the problems.
The second exquisite rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that using land for factories will provide the humans with job opportunities. It is obvious that humans needs comes first before animals. A vivid example can shed some light on my stance. Five years ago, my neighboring city was undergoing economical problems because of low city revenue. Then, the authorities decided to clear the nearby forest and built a factory. Surprisingly, this has a huge impact on the economy of city. Since building a new factory provided the employement opportunities to city dwellers. Not only people were able to raise the standards of their lives by getting employments but, it also reduces the crimes rates. Because when people's needs were fulfilled, they had no need left for doing the crimes. My example manifests
By perusing the above paragraphs one can infer that though saving endangered animals is good, but fulfilling the human needs by farming and constructing houses and factories are of paramount importance. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, it will solve the problem of overpopulation by fulfiling people's residental needs. Second, It will provide employment oppotunities to people
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 583, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...s are more important than animals needs.In what follows, I will delve into the mos...
^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...ces in my city is getting over crowded. These is no place to build a new building. Mo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 715, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are buliding stories above the buildings .As a result, the quality of life is decl...
^^
Line 2, column 717, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...e buliding stories above the buildings .As a result, the quality of life is declin...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ago, my neighboring city was undergoing economical problems because of low city revenue. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, as a result, by and large, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2404.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07172995781 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88541582008 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1430645561 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335301684137 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791157921118 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095295715967 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213823055836 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516787615692 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.