As the leader of a city, what would you do to ensure the prosperity and success of the city?
A. creating job opportunities for the unemployed;
B. lowering food price;
C. providing affordable housing
In recent years there is general discussion of as a leader of a city what should they do to ensure the prosperity and success of city. Some people believe that they should creating job opportunities for the unemployed and another people think they should lowering food price. In my opinion, I am afraid I can’t agree with their point. Personally, this question only be solved by providing affordable house.
The main reason why I agree that providing affordable housing is it can retention of labor. This policies not only can let people who because the high house prices keep bake, but also can let people who want buy house people come to your city. For example in early years Hainan the house is very cheap and also many people know how beautiful of the Hainan. So alot of people choose migration to Haikou or Sanya. And also use my uncle as another example: in the past he live in his hometown, but now because the house price increase, he choose leave the hometown, go to work and live in shanghai. So I think the better and cheaper houses can retain labors.
I can give you another illustration. If you choose creating job opportunities for the unemployed. It not only unfair to another people who have job but also bad for social and economic progress. We often wonder why people don’t have job. The biggest question is they don’t hard work as work as they should do. And another is we don’t need so much labor in the market. For example nowadays more and more work place be replace by robots. And also instead if their have too much labor will take another loss. So that is why I think choose increase the labor is not a good idea.
Admittedly let food price become lower will let people reduce social stress, but it will not only can not take the whole city’ prosperity and success. Instead let price of commodities change. If the government revenue declined they will get it from the tax. Not to mention weather the farmer want to decrease the price.
All in all considering about it can retention of labor, creating job opportunities for the unemployed is unfair to another people.my idea is quite clear that as a leader of a city, we should choose providing affordable housing to ensure the prosperity and success of the city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...e housing is it can retention of labor. This policies not only can let people who b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using is it can retention of labor. This policies not only can let people who bec...
^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...ow because the house price increase, he choose leave the hometown, go to work and live...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to leave'
Suggestion: to leave
...use the house price increase, he choose leave the hometown, go to work and live in sh...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to create'.
Suggestion: to create
...you another illustration. If you choose creating job opportunities for the unemployed. I...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
... only unfair to another people who have job but also bad for social and economic pr...
^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...often wonder why people don't have job. The biggest question is they don'...
^^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'work as'.
Suggestion: work as
...iggest question is they don't hard work as work as they should do. And another is we don&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 552, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to increase'
Suggestion: to increase
...her loss. So that is why I think choose increase the labor is not a good idea. Admitted...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...hole city' prosperity and success. Instead let price of commodities change. If the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nstead let price of commodities change. If the government revenue declined they wi...
^^
Line 6, column 199, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to provide'.
Suggestion: to provide
...as a leader of a city, we should choose providing affordable housing to ensure the prospe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, i think, i am afraid, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48042335096 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4575 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5572934069 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327320348963 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858081968291 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103298769492 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20277022068 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978825510521 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.