Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as member of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or Why not? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Pets are always the best friend of humans. These relations keep going from years to years. Some people treat their pets as a family member and have a close relationship with their pets. I think this relationship good. I hold this opinion because of several reasons which explain as follows.
Firstly, I want to discuss about how this relationship works. When we pet an animal, they things we as their parents and they start acting like that. The amount of care and love make this bond strong day by day and when they feel comfortable, they start to communicate with us by their body language. This bond is unique, and very few people will get succuss to maintain it as long.
Secondly, this kind of relationship brings happiness and also it helps to reduces the tress. And maybe that is the reason some people have a very close relationship with their pets. They didn’t expect more from us, and that is the reason we feel more relax with them. Also, they help us to heal mental illness, because they sense it and try to make more love and affection towards us. I want to explain this point by giving my own example, I have a pet cat, and her name is Kittu. She is very close to me from starting, but this bond gets stronger over the time. There was a phase in my life when I suffered from a depression, and that time I feel that she senses this and she started spending a more time with me. And also, she never leaves me alone and also, she always forcing me to play with her. With the time, I forgot my problems and that makes me more relax and peaceful. This is reason, I had a very strong bond with my pet and I am close to her.
Therefore, I think pets are always help humans in different ways and that is the reason some people have a close bond with their pets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...ship works. When we pet an animal, they things we as their parents and they start acti...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'longs'?
Suggestion: longs
...ople will get succuss to maintain it as long. Secondly, this kind of relationship...
^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'reduce'.
Suggestion: reduce
...p brings happiness and also it helps to reduces the tress. And maybe that is the reason...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'forces'.
Suggestion: forces
...er leaves me alone and also, she always forcing me to play with her. With the time, I f...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...er. Therefore, I think pets are always help humans in different ways and that is th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32035928144 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19063694926 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473053892216 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9956045271 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.15 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242522843113 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093300930795 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120152408762 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204370555044 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988269250613 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 58.1214874552 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.48 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.42 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.247311828 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.