No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
The statement claims that, the growth of any particular field is related with many other fields. In my view, the statement is fairly generalized . I strongly believe that the development and growth of the field is correlated to many other phenomena, objectives, empirical relations and experience of other fields.
The chief reason why I am agree with the claim is, the fact that no particular invention or advancement is purely related to only one single thing or principle. For an example, advancement in technology has to do with wider range of fields. The size of first computer is far bigger than the current pocket computer. To achieve this tremendous success, the phenomena and principles of integrated circuits, heat transfer, data storage capacity, material strength and electronics communication are mixed and correlated with each other. The advancement in operating system has to do with the knowledge of several equipments like arduino mega and arduino uno.
Like technology, the study of any particular subject or methodology is interconnected to several methodologies. To study the concept of black-hole, the knowledge of quantum physics, reflection and absorbing phenomena of light and black hole, relativity principle and thesis related to space is necessary. Without having the outside knowledge one cannot produce the appealing results in the field. Similarly, dearth of erudite people and illusion of ideas for advancement will lead to waste of time and efforts.
Apart from that, it also applies in study of politics, economy, evolution of animals including mankind, atmosphere, psychology, medical science, automation and even in arts. Latest example for this is the DMIT test. In this test by taking finger prints of the person, the behavior, strong points, weak points, improvements etc can be determined. This method is widely used among students to know their best interest and capabilities. This method incorporates psychology and neuroscience( the nervous system). In simple words it interconnects mind with the fingerprints of the individual. In contrast to this, the person with knowledge of only psychology cannot develop any strong efficient method of brain mapping.
In sum, the correlation or incorporation of the fields will ultimately lead to the advancement and improvement of human life directly or indirectly. It is beneficial for making our lives easy. For doing so, the experience and plenty of knowledge of wide ranges of fields is the primary need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...iew, the statement is fairly generalized . I strongly believe that the development...
^^
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...er fields. The chief reason why I am agree with the claim is, the fact that no par...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
...l science, automation and even in arts. Latest example for this is the DMIT test. In t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g efficient method of brain mapping. In sum, the correlation or incorporation o...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'apart from', 'as for', 'as to', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to', 'in my view']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.300904977376 0.229887763892 131% => OK
Verbs: 0.115384615385 0.158761421928 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0904977375566 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384615384615 0.046263068375 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0180995475113 0.0685040099705 26% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.131221719457 0.118717715034 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0361990950226 0.0351676179071 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.02429892007 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027149321267 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0972850678733 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0113122171946 0.0209618222197 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00226244343891 0.0139019557991 16% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2497.0 2387.08602151 105% => OK
No of words: 390.0 408.028673835 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40256410256 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.415384615385 0.338922669872 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325641025641 0.251872472559 129% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.241025641026 0.174417080927 138% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197435897436 0.112833075102 175% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02429892007 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.524397521467 110% => OK
Word variations: 67.6517939263 59.2087087015 114% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7272727273 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0004615768 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 120.699889404 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 50.2913752914 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 2.72368421053 1.45489161554 187% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21669572348 0.300154397459 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0820193228018 0.103427244359 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0583498149161 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528767860678 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160231479058 0.151897553556 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827706495752 0.114077575197 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556406500599 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.437339412395 0.336927656856 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0408116464451 0.067059652881 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150152241216 0.210909579961 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036629484261 0.0618886996521 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.