Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Evaluating students in schools and universities has always been a place of controversy among scholars. While some of them believes that the prominent goal of education should be learn the whole asppects of life, others emphsize on individual growth. On of the material that are still in the debate is whether the resulat of group project assignment should be considered as a criteria to evaluate students, or this project should be consided as a practice. I firmly believe that group projects should be graded by teachers, in a way that all the membares receive a same mark. There are some advantagous to this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.
The first and most important reason is that the group projects are similar to a society's situation. A number of people cooperate with each other to reach a finite goal, however, a lot of ways exist to reach aim. For example, some of the members of a group prefer to have regular plan, divide the duty in some section and each element do one part daily. On the other hand, others want to involve in all sections to know profoundly the course's matreials. The diffrent mindsets are apparent. But, the rsult of the society is one thing for all member, seperate of the way. So the same final results of this project learn students how to live in society.
The second noteworthy point I want to mention is that improving the social skills is more important the grade. In contrast, students think that their foremost goal is grade. So if the group project has effect directly in the students final grade, the student oblige themselves to in corporate in the project. Thus they force themselves to enhance their social skills, indeed.
In sum, I firmly believe that the group projects should have same grade for all the members. Some reasons lead me to this viewpoint, Chief amongst them is that students learn how to live in society. Aside from this reason, the student subconsiously force themselves to improve social skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learned', 'learnt'?
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...e prominent goal of education should be learn the whole asppects of life, others emph...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criterion' or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: a criterion; criteria
...ject assignment should be considered as a criteria to evaluate students, or this project s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...f ways exist to reach aim. For example, some of the members of a group prefer to have regul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...mselves to in corporate in the project. Thus they force themselves to enhance their ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80747126437 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52467509673 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5619704124 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0526315789 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320509143011 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971358590699 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104336495567 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192870706044 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127512383854 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.