It is fact that teachers can thoroughly evaluate student’s academic performance through their involvement in their school assignments. On that ground, students are mandatory to work on their day-to-day school homework for different subjects. In this regard, when students are caught cheating on their homework, many people believe that they should charge penalty or teachers can punish them by making their coursework more difficult. On the other side, there is a group of people who contend that parents is the right choice who can make understand their children in this matter. Certainly, from my vantage point, the latter view contains more weight. For the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most conspicuous raasons and examples justifying my stance.
The more exquisite point to be mentioned is that irrefutably children at this age are not enough matured to value money and when they are asked to pay the penalty in the form of money, apparently, it would not create any distinguish difference in their daily habits. In fact, this decision might increases the load on parent’s heads. To shed more light on this I would like to reveal the real life incidence of mine. When I was in fifth standard, few my batchmates were caught coping their coursework, and thereby, school have charged a big amount of penalty on them. Unforntunately, at that time they were laughing and feeling proud on themselves since they didnot get punished directly. What is more that they thought that it was just a small matter and they could keep continuing copying after paying of penalty. Ultimatly, their attitude and way of thinking clearly showed that they did not regret of what they had done wrong.
Another equally noteworthy reason is that giving the charge to parents is a judicious decision that school could take as parents are the one who usually spend their whole day with their children. Hence, firstly they can softly make their children understand that they are in fault and try to explain them about long-term consequences of performing these type of habits in future. Furthermore, they can strictly watch on their children whenever they work on their class assignments. To explify, based on a new statistics what has been collected from a research at University of California that 85% of children follow what their parents teach them. Similarly, if the same rule is applied when children get caught of copying, parents can nudge them stop their bad habit and encourage to follow a good habit in their lives. Admittedly, no one can be the best than parents who can make their children feel their mistakes so children would stop behaving in certain ways.
To recapitulate, from contemplating all remarks, inspite of the fact that some people may not agree with my viewpoint, I strongly believe that parents can easily motivate their children and stop their bad habits. This is because they are very close to them and children do not easily listen anyother’s voice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nces of performing these type of habits in future. Furthermore, they can strictly watch o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...statistics what has been collected from a research at University of California that 85% of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 782, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'following'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: following
...them stop their bad habit and encourage to follow a good habit in their lives. Admittedly...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, similarly, so, in fact, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05060728745 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62376057523 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9074279424 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.80952381 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5238095238 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2076106002 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067371587009 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594488706105 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129512558098 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856840686066 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.