Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that today high rate of change in technology and society make a realistic prediction about potential jobs that can lead to a successful future impossible. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that in the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
First and foremost, today governments' managers become helpless from regulating the number of job positions with the number of educated people. It is the serious problem of our today society which a lot of young people cannot find a job, because the population of academic educated people are so much higher than available careers. However, in the past, all of the students who enter universities were sure that they would be able to have an appropriate job and a happy life in future.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that the occupation situation is even more severe for workers and people without academic education. In recent years, the high speed of development in science and technology leads to industries need lesser and lesser labors to powered their production. For example, in most factories, the old instruments are replacing with new ones which are completely automatics. Last year my uncle lost his job at a logging factory because of this happen.
Finally, yet importantly, some rules make job conditions very uncertain for employees. For example, in the past, most of the people employed permanently by companies. Nonetheless, today most employment is temporary, and government rules are mainly in favor of bosses rather workers. The head of companies is able to faired people without any difficulty, the circumstance that increases stress and anxiety for employees.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that in the past it was easier to identify which type of career lead to a successful life. Because today the number of applicants suppress the number of job positions, and employment rules are not fair for workers, and high tech technology is quickly changing industries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...vailable careers. However, in the past, all of the students who enter universities were su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ave an appropriate job and a happy life in future. Another significant fact that shoul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11271676301 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82508943961 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3436682549 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329890108521 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107162784486 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188236370444 0.0737576698707 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198979393056 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19056527369 0.0645574589148 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.