People now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past.

There are myriad factors or considerations which take into that in comparison of the past people now are better at protecting the environment. As far as I concerned according to the following reasons and from my personal experiences, I am of the conviction that people are better to focus on protecting the environment than they before. Someone can concisely wight the pros and cons of each. The reason for my conviction will be explored in the following essay.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my viewpoint with the example is nowadays people care more about the environment because of the past in that time people don't think about future so in that way damage the environment in many ways unit know people starting to realize that if they don't protect the environment there will be nothing left for future with increasing global warming people start to realize that best way to protect from this by protecting the environment my experience is an excellent example of this in my village there is a campaigned start by government to not cut trees and forest as this the reason for unbalancing change in climate.
Apart from the fact mention above, one should consider another sublet point meticulously pertaining to obtain huge experiences. The noteworthy refreshing statistic revealed by recent social research conducted in my country in which majority of people agree that to save the future for there childer people need to start protecting the environment or there will be the more worst condition for them, to shade the light on this issue according to the research done by Delhi Univesity now the company started making eco friendly products which help to save the environment and people more by these products than not eco friendly.
Admittedly, some can justification to another side by saying that in the past people don't rely on this much in technology than they are now which is the main cost why the environment gets destroyed in the first place and by trying to find new technology and money now they don't worry about the environment as making money is their first priority but I still affirm to the fact people are more focus on protecting the environment now.
In summary, by all the affarmentiond above one should consider that people now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
... viewpoint with the example is nowadays people care more about the environment because...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...because of the past in that time people dont think about future so in that way damag...
^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...people starting to realize that if they dont protect the environment there will be n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...ng the environment or there will be the more worst condition for them, to shade the light ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the worst'.
Suggestion: more the worst
...ng the environment or there will be the more worst condition for them, to shade the light ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... side by saying that in the past people dont rely on this much in technology than th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... find new technology and money now they dont worry about the environment as making m...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, apart from, in summary, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93686868687 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72250214074 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462121212121 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.1344086022 219% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 205.884541538 48.9658058833 420% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 217.222222222 100.406767564 216% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.0 20.6045352989 214% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526816742429 0.236089414692 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243775428118 0.076458572812 319% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209322068312 0.0737576698707 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370065536721 0.150856017488 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157074893534 0.0645574589148 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 11.7677419355 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 58.1214874552 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.1575268817 202% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.26 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.0537634409 195% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.