People nowadays spend much more time than they should use text messages and new technologies such as social media to communicate with each other.
The first thing I do after get up every day is to turn on my cell phone and check all the messages form social apps, such as Facebook, Instagram, and WeChat, which usually take me more than 30 minutes. Through new technologies, messages can be sent back and forth with ease. Some experts, as well as the elder people, complain that social media wastes young people too much time and the young should use their time doing other things more meaningful. According to my perspective, however, it is necessary for people to spend time on social media.
First of all, the more times people use social media to communicate, the closer they are. Since the people’s jobs nowadays are with relatively less leisure time, people have few chance to meet and have the face-to-face conversation with their friends. Therefore, in order to maintain close friendships with them, it is a good way to make full use of social media. With their help, greetings can be sent between friends as often as possible and in-depth chats and discussions can be carried out frequently. In this case, both sides can feel that they are being thought of by the other even if they are unable to hang out in person for a while.
Secondly, the distance between people can be narrowed by using social media and sending messages. With the process of globalization, increasing people have opportunities to learn different languages and cultures. Hence, social apps can provide people precious chances to meet different people from various countries. I am interested in foreign languages and keep learning them, but my hometown is a small city where no foreigner lives. By using social media, I can easily find foreigners who are willing to help me to better understand and form a clearer picture of their countries. It takes me a hug amount time to ask and answer questions about them. However, I believe it is totally worthwhile.
Undeniable, indulging in using social media can cause problems of getting along well with others in real life and hinder people’s jobs. In light of the above-mentioned possibility, I suggest that the young should care more about family members and friends around them. Some things, like chatting online during a family reunion, using phones in business meetings or making foreign friends when you are having fun with friends in person, should be avoided. Thus, people may not ignore their relations in real life and only think about net pals.
In conclusion, spending time on social media is an inevitable trend in today’s society which can bring lots of advantages to people. Everybody should embrace it as long as they can remember to pay enough attention in daily life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chance seems to be countable; consider using: 'few chances'.
Suggestion: few chances
...latively less leisure time, people have few chance to meet and have the face-to-face conve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'longs'?
Suggestion: longs
... people. Everybody should embrace it as long as they can remember to pay enough atte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95796460177 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6449029454 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573008849558 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.756417757 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.863636364 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372822196454 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10521162221 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750930029434 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208104060802 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08089864779 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.