People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do- rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays people have become self-righteous about their choice and they are enjoying their life as they can. In my opinion, being a social animal, people should take care of others in their vicinity if their activities are responsible rather focusing on their own norms only. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, due to the self-centeredness nature of the people, they are losing their values in the society. People who only focus on their way of thinking neglecting others normally get estranged by the other members in the society. For instance, the situation faced by my uncle is the compelling evidence of this. My uncle is the senior executive director of renowned organization. By his status, people used to consider him as intellectual member of the society if any decision has to be taken. When my uncle started using sport car which used to produce high noise, other people of the society started to fell disturbed. They requested to my uncle to understand the scenario but for own happiness my uncle showed disinterestedness about the situation. Then, the people of the society started to neglect my uncle and they stopped to call my uncle in societal meetings. This example clarifies the negative impact that can cause when people starts to do things without being responsible.
Secondly, in any country, political leaders are elected by the people so that these elected leaders could solve the afflictions of the whole country. But after being elected, political leaders spends their time more into earning money so that they can uplift the situation of even next seven generations. For example, the activities shown by the political leaders of India illustrates this scenario. About two years ago, in Gujrat, one of the city of India, people elected their political leader. They were hoping the best days of Gujrati people near to come. But, after reaching on the mighty level that elected leader did not visited once to the people. After some months, that leader started to ride exorbitant high priced cars. This scenario illustrates that people nowadays have become egoistic. They do what they what rather than being responsible to others.
In conclusion, I think that people have forgotten their duties, what they should do and should not do. Such irresponsible activities never do well for humans rather it degrades our status and dignity.
- The widespread use of internet has given people access to information on a level experienced before. How does this availability of internet has influenced life in todays'world.Give examples to support your idea.70
- Life today is easier ans more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers.70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.58
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'visit'
...ighty level that elected leader did not visited once to the people. After some months, ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06982543641 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63859726156 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531172069825 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4153636656 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.3913043478 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4347826087 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228364363003 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686972801316 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874641905128 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164421068767 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893898301537 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.