For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers?
The school as an academic center, the main responsibility of which is to prepare students for having both a successful profession and personal lives. Experiences acquire at the school make students decide their path and make a progress day in day out. Some people argue that teachers should be evaluated by other teachers. On the other hand, some people take a radically different view and point out that it is better to assess a teacher by students. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that although the idea of both teacher and student is considerable, students spend most of their time with their teachers and are familiar with different hallmarks of their teachers. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, it is established beyond doubt that teachers play a consequential role in every given society because they are pillars of the society. Indeed, hardly can any society make an impressive progress without the presence of teachers. Generally phrased, teachers should be experienced and knowledgeable enough to educate crowds of children. So, their evaluation by students plays a key role in teachers' performances because not only are students familiar with teachers' style of teaching but also are able to assess them vigorously and successfully. As a palpable example, students spend most of their time at schools and are in a close contact with educators. Therefore, they are acquaintance with teachers' hallmarks, characteristics, methods, style of teaching and so forth. To elucidate more on this issue, students will be able to offer an impartial judge when it comes to teachers' evaluation because the only thing which is important for students is to improve education by the help of teacher's knowledge.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that evaluation by students would have a profound impact on the performance of teachers. If we take a minute to ponder over it, some teachers might pass the buck and do not carry out their responsibility precisely and completely. So, it will prevent students from making a progress because the teacher is not familiar with his career. Somehow, a negative assessment by students not only can shock and stir up the teacher to shift the style but also can provide support and incentive for the teacher to do his best. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that being evaluated by students is largely beneficial for teachers because it provides an opportunity for the educator to distinguish their positive and negative factors.
However, every coin has two sides. The startling fact which flabbergasted and bewildered me is that teachers only take students' assessment into consideration. Indeed, a plethora of students evaluate teachers based on their scores they receive. For instance, if they gain a high score, their evaluation is positive. Otherwise, the evaluation will be self-oriented and unuseful. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'impressive progress'.
Suggestion: impressive progress
...ty. Indeed, hardly can any society make an impressive progress without the presence of teachers. Gener...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2733.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16635160681 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94907541824 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6022777327 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.32 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.16 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347343544368 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973912499726 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891711116676 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18972427427 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103583895447 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.