Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why?
Nowadays, most people use vehicles in order to travel to distant areas or commuting to school or work. Of course, They use either public or private transportation in order to satisfy their need. However, governments are capable of influencing this choice by managing the budget efficiently. Personally, I believe that the authorities should expend more funding for public service of transporting. I have two rationales for holding this opinion, and I will explore these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, increasing condition and accessibility of roads instead of public vehicles will probably encourage citizens to utilize their own cars, so air pollution and traffic jam will increase. If the quality of public service is impoverished, most people will prefer to employ their own car in order not to experience the inadequate situation of public service. On the other hand, if they are aware of the fact that subways, buses or subways are of high quality while using their private automobile is difficult because of condition of roads, they will prefer to utilize these services. The less individuals use their own vehicle, the less pollution and congestion on road will be. The current circumstance of my nation, Mongolia, is a compelling example of this. In my country, the authorities of Mongolia expend the revenue of taxation mainly for roads rather than public transporting services. Thereby, these services, are poor and remote for citizens. Of course, most individuals drive their cars so that they can avert the unpleasant condition of transportation devoted for public. As a result of this, air pollution is at high level, which is detrimental for local people. Moreover, drivers spend hours on a road while commuting by virtue of packed roadway every day when they drive a car. If the regime devoted more money on public transportation, citizens would not have utilized their car by excreting smoke and causing traffic jam.
Secondly, public transportation of high quality will be accessible for every indigenous individual, so everyone will benefit from the enhancement of service similarly. By contrast, people of my country need to meet some requirements in order to drive their own vehicle such as being at least eighteen years old and available to purchase the car. Unfortunately, some individuals are incapable of driving a car in light of their age, or financial security. Therefore, they cannot benefit from the enhancement of highways as they are discriminated by aristocracies. For instance, I do not have enough money to buy private vehicle. Thus, only chance, that I have is, to use buses in order to commute to my university. Consequently, I am suffering from horrible aspects of public service as I mentioned above. Moreover, I am certain that many people like me who are incapable of driving are inevitably employing public service. If the statesmen of my nation expend more budget for enhancement of public service, these people will take advantage on this, and commute to their destination in comfortable situation, transportation of high quality.
In summation, I am of the opinion of that the authorities have to expend more fiscal for transporting system which service the all citizens of the particular area. This is because amount of air pollution and traffic jam will decrease, and people who cannot afford the private automobile will take advantage on this improvement as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, increasing condition and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun individuals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...l prefer to utilize these services. The less individuals use their own vehicle, the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xcreting smoke and causing traffic jam. Secondly, public transportation of high ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uation, transportation of high quality. In summation, I am of the opinion of th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, of course, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2896.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23688969259 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99025533412 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461121157324 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 935.1 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.183958879 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.259259259 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4814814815 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114890196587 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313408647892 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331900177444 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074793693656 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126552350685 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.