Should nuclear power plants be banned?
Nowadays, banning nuclear power plants is a thorny issue around the world. Some people might say that nuclear power plants are necessary in our lives because alternative power is less plausible for living a stable life. On the other hand, I believe that nuclear power plants should be banned in order to stop global warming. In addition, there is a risk of explosion as a result of natural disasters.
To begin with, every year, global warming has been deteriorating around the world. Some developing countries, such as China and India, are producing a huge amount of harmful gases into the atmosphere compared to other countries because, after the turn of the century, these countries started growing at a rapid speed. Apart from these countries, many countries utilize nuclear power plants. In other words, it is integrated into our lives and is necessary to maintain electricity in our society. On the other hand, it greatly contributes to global warming in terms of producing carbon dioxide. If we stop using electricity from nuclear power plants, it will be difficult to rely on renewable energy, but we have no choice if we want to protect our nature. In addition, if we use renewable energy actively, it might be possible to maintain our lives only using renewable energy. Therefore, banning nuclear power plants is quite an important point in the shift to alternative energies.
Secondly, the explosion of nuclear power plants has devastating effects around the world. Of course, nuclear power contributes to our lives, but if a catastrophe occurs, it has the power to kill people easily and destroy the environment quickly. For example, Japan experienced the explosion of nuclear power plants in 2009 due to the earthquake. Many people realized how dangerous nuclear power plants were after this accident, and many people started to ban nuclear power plants because they experienced direct and felt fear at that time. This accident has an impact not only on the United States but also on neighboring countries, so we had a responsibility to pay a huge amount of money to other countries, and it is hard to revive nature which destroyed by the explosion of nuclear power plants.
To sum up, nuclear power plants have many drawbacks, such as producing harmful gases and the risks of killing people and nature. These are two reasons why I absolutely agree that nuclear power plants should be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, banning nuclear power plants i...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion as a result of natural disasters. To begin with, every year, global warmin...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the shift to alternative energies. Secondly, the explosion of nuclear power...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the explosion of nuclear power plants. To sum up, nuclear power plants have man...
^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t nuclear power plants should be banned.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, for example, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0425 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65091375756 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4725 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3443213524 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.157894737 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.515855067811 0.236089414692 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183897025458 0.076458572812 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159467673876 0.0737576698707 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382531661705 0.150856017488 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12623215509 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.