Some famous athletes and entertainers earn millions of dollars every year Do you think these people deserve such high salaries

Essay topics:

Some famous athletes and entertainers earn millions of dollars every year. Do you think these people deserve such high salaries?

Athletes have played an important role in any society since the mother of sports, marathon, was created. There have been many debates about whether Famed athletes and performance people who make so much money annually are deserved or not. In my opinion, entertainers people merit to get a lot of money. My reasons substantiated in the subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that they are the most effective person in society. To clarify this view, they have opted between dilemma bad and good ways to spend their money, but they always consider a more positive effect on their fans than the worse one. For example, sportsman always plays an act as an actor in advertisements which have been showing on television, such as using medical care, eating healthy food, and drinking energy drinks, to name but a few. These advertisements outweigh those advert having been displayed by factories and companies. Also, actors of series and films and comedians have tried to not only educate people valuable ethnic but also make them delighted. Therefore, famous athletes and actors have a deep and positive effect on people’s souls and physicals; famous individuals are worthy of receiving so much money, so their pockets will be full of dollars.
Another key point that makes me hold this view is that professional sportsman spends the majority of the money they receive on the charity. In this vein, they not only aid people to a great extend but also the endowments they have forgiven have been remarkably impacted on their salaries. If celebrities had not allocated part of their money, they would not be the proper competence to earn millions of currencies.
The Final reason that comes to my mind is that reputable people have endeavored hard before they were becoming famed because they believed themselves and their goals. Their behavior should be prized by the whole of society. Needless to say, wealth is accompanied by fame, so if celebrated individuals are astonishingly in welfare, there will not need to answer any question about how they accumulate their wealth such as Ronaldo, Messi, and so on; thus, the harder people work, the more they will gain.
To arrive at the conclusion, I firmly agree with the idea that well-known people should earn money with high salary due to the fact that their role is not pale on the society, they always facilitate fans by building the association charity, and the diligent person has been improving themselves by spending much time until they gradually achieve their targets.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r people work, the more they will gain. To arrive at the conclusion, I firmly ag...
^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l they gradually achieve their targets.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04028436019 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60189681368 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571090047393 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1656921707 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110583853164 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374811134642 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338799913006 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669377029572 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240661209679 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r people work, the more they will gain. To arrive at the conclusion, I firmly ag...
^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l they gradually achieve their targets.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04028436019 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60189681368 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571090047393 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1656921707 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110583853164 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374811134642 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338799913006 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669377029572 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240661209679 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.