Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?

Essay topics:

Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?

Smartphones and Internet are one of the greatest inventions in recent time. Like any other invention, Smartphones and Internet have their own pros and cons. On one side they're powerful source of knowledge and learning while on the other hand, those are great distractions and a source for grasping bad things as well which has significant impact on children and students' lifestyle. Even after considering the significant cons, I am in favor of young children owning smartphones with internet connectivity.

Firstly, Smartphones and Internet are powerful source of information and knowledge like an ocean. They have vast information about every field from science to arts, culture and history. It helps children to learn about various things in detail which are not properly mentioned in the books. Moreover, there are several tools available for exam prepartion like online lecture videos by experts, practice papers etc.

Secondly, childhood is like a foundation for children and it needs to be strong. The children should use it to explore their talents not just completely devoting for studies, not every child is meant to be an engineer or doctor, some should be dancers, cricketers and actors too. For that reason, internet encourages children to try various other things. For example, they see people getting popular and very young kids performing on reality shows which works as an encouragement for children and they also develop a thinking of trying out other things which they might be best at.

Finally, there is a need to be updated with latest technology and gadgets. Otherwise, they face problems later adjusting to such things which becomes necessity and it makes them feel inferior in front of others. For an example, it would be lot easier for a child who has been using Computers and Smartphones, to learn and use any advance gadgets and machines like self-check-in machine at airports or self-metro-tickets at Metro stations than the child who was forbidden from using smartphones.

In conclusion, though, there are various disadvantages of Smartphones and Internet, still the advantages overpower and overwhelm those disadvantages. Those are resources for knowledge and learning any new thing from studies to dance. Those motivate children to explore and try out their talent in other fields. Also, it keeps them technologically updated and helps them feel confident. Therefore, children should be given access to Smartphones and Internet but with proper guidance and instructions to use it in best way possible.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ve their own pros and cons. On one side theyre powerful source of knowledge and learni...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...werful source of knowledge and learning while on the other hand, those are great dist...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
... Finally, there is a need to be updated with latest technology and gadgets. Otherwise, they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 510, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...per guidance and instructions to use it in best way possible.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33498759305 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88335119981 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543424317618 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0953201173 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213850721142 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662970480593 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403500007924 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11973379403 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436305787989 0.0645574589148 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.