Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while some others like to eat at home.
Which do you prefer? Why?
The modern society has witness a dramatic progress in economy during the past several decades, which has extremely improved people’s living standard. A considerable number of people may choose to have meals at restaurant due to its convenience, while taking into account the expenditure, the vast majority of people are more willing to eat at home. From my perspective, I would rather cook meals at home than eat outside.
Admittedly, numerous people prefer to have their meals outside due to the urgent need for saving time. Modern people are tied up in a fast-paced life and feel overwhelmed. The white-collar class, in particular, has been deprived of time with adequate rest due to tight schedule, not to mention cook by themselves. That’s why an increasing number of people have to eat at restaurant. For instance, an investigation conducted by the New York Times has brought out that over seventy percent of white-collar workers have lunches outside on account of the limited break time. Hence, the aforementioned reasons may account for a part of the reasons why more people eat outside.
However, if I were the decision-maker, I would prefer to cook meals at home since it exerts a positive impact on my physical health. If we frequently have meals at restaurants, the excessive additives and even gutter cooking oil contained in the food may be extremely detrimental to our health. By contrast, if we have meals at home, we will give top priority to the healthy and safe ingredients, which is certainly conducive to our health. In addition, it is entirely probable that the dishes sold in restaurants are made of stale ingredients and also contain high calories, which may increase the rate of obesity. Conversely, the food cooked by ourselves are more healthy because we will pay much attention to buy fresh and low-fat ingredients. Therefore, eating at home can lead us a healthier life.
What’s more, it will also be more economical for us to cook our meals at home. Although people generally have higher payments currently, the high salary is often accompanied by high price of everything, thus people need to make an effort to allocate their income appropriately. The expenditure of rent, medical service as well as education should all be taken into consideration. Otherwise, they may fail to make ends meet. However, eating outside in a daily basis may occupy a considerable proportion of their income since the restaurant has to gain profits. So it is the most cost-efficient for them to eat at home. Then they can spend more money on other meaningful things, such as travelling or getting further education. Hence, eating at home can help relieve people’s heavy financial burden.
To sum up, even though many people are preferable to eat outside because of their intense schedule, I am in favor of cooking meals at home due to the healthy and economic factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'dramatic progress'.
Suggestion: dramatic progress
The modern society has witness a dramatic progress in economy during the past several deca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in particular, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06860706861 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94891769879 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534303534304 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1352773939 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0416666667 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331053849235 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100734343377 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784544940673 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207255263251 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045544540809 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.