Some people prefer to eat meals at restaurants, while others like to prepare and eat food in their own home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is signifcant for a person to eat a healthy meal which can be cooked and eat for themselves or can be eat at a resturant. In my opinion I prefer to prepare and eat food at home. In the following essay I intend to put forth my points to support my view.
To begin with, I keep myself more healthy by eating food prepared at home. In resturants a good nutritional meal is difficult to find as many resturants have junk food, which is not good for health. Moreover, nutritious food is expensive at restaurants. To exemplify, I went to a Turkish restaurant so I could enjoy a healthy nutritious meal. I ordered the lamb kebabs with rice. When the food came it was very small portion which hardly enough for a person. Moreover it was so oily and had bad smell in it. When I paid for the meal it cost me $50 for such a little meal. It was the worst experience for me because the meal was not very tasty, unhealthy and it was expensive. Therefore, I m in the favour of preparing and eating food at home.
In addition, cooking is an amazing activity that can be enjoy along with family members. While when preparing food is a good time to get along with family members. It also helps me feel relax. My own experience is a compelling example. When I come home from work, I usually prepare food for my family because this gives me a sense of satisfaction. When I cook food, my son and my husband helps me during which we enjoy talking and sharing our day routine. In this way our family bonding increases and we stay close together as family. In this way I can enjoy family time and eat healthy meal. As a result, I believe it is better to cook and eat food at home.
In conclusion, I prefer to cook and eat food at home rather than going to a restaurant. This is because, home cooked food is more healthy and less expensive, and because it is a great activity to get bond with family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is not good for health. Moreover, nutritious food is expensive at restaura...
^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...rtion which hardly enough for a person. Moreover it was so oily and had bad smell in it....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... me because the meal was not very tasty, unhealthy and it was expensive. Therefor...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and eating food at home. In addition, cooking is an amazing activity that can ...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can be enjoy along with family members. While when preparing food is a good time to g...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27374301676 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49036719757 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45530726257 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5710886719 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.75 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266934578228 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921279644077 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958083939994 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188234583292 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508069011943 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.1 11.7677419355 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.89 10.9000537634 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.