Some people prefer to take small classes (fewer students), such as the professors can remember students' names. Others like big classes (lots of students), which one do you prefer?
On the whole, it is of little doubt, in any, education environment is an issue of great consideration and importance. A positive class environment can affect both student’s quality of education and the level of performance in daily tasks, both social and professional. Consequently, the number of members who contribute to a class may seem to have a priority. In this regard, some people wonder whether big classes with lots of students are better. In my view, classes with fewer students are more desirable and I prefer to take them. In the ensuing lines, I will provide two reasons for the corroboration of this thesis.
The first reason worthy of consideration is that in classes with a fewer number of individual, professors can be more supportive. Due to the more time professors have for each student, this atmosphere allows students to ask if they need help in their academic process and look into more questions. The more opportunities to ask questions, the more chances to feel comfortable. As a result, students get championed more conveniently by professors. Moreover, these supportive teacher-student relationships have a positive impact on class participation, engagement, and ultimately a student’s achievements. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was studying architecture, our design studio lecturer allocated time for each student in order to correct their mistake in projects. As our class contains only ten persons, each student including me having adequate time for corrections. I really enjoyed those moments because I could ask my questions face to face and proper guidance’s from my professors helped me to become a better architectural designer. This indicates that fewer students in the class are more beneficial.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that students can communicate better if the class is not crowded. A smaller number of members in a class provides opportunities to get to know each other. In other words, the class can become a group of close friends. Students have more chances for deeper communication and this can help to build and foster a safe learning environment where students can thrive, prosper, and learn. As an illustration, take the example of a class that includes few students. In only one semester including sixteen weeks and one day per week, students spend more than 100 hours with their classmates. That's enough time to build a relationship that could ignite a student's lifetime love of communicating. This example clarifies limited students in a class have a lot of great options.
To sum up, by and large, based on the contemplation of all the aforementioned reasons, I prefer attending a class with a smaller number of members. This is because a more supportive professor can be and better opportunity for communication. I think students should experience these classes in their educational period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re desirable and I prefer to take them. In the ensuing lines, I will provide two r...
^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e than 100 hours with their classmates. Thats enough time to build a relationship tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...uild a relationship that could ignite a students lifetime love of communicating. This ex...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, i think, as a result, by and large, in my view, in other words, on the whole, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.194092827 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16507731306 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504219409283 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3923724471 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1851851852 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85185185185 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39049163215 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118367829467 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818545057401 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261973381075 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507300746616 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.