Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Plants and animals are the main ecological factors for balancing the climatic condition of nature whereas birds and animals have equal rights on earth as humans. But due to unnecessary human activities and greed to earn more money and resources have made these species endangered. I strongly believe that these species should be preserved for future generation for the reasons I will cover in below passage.

To begin with, animals and plants plays a prominent role in maintaining the balance of climate. They regulate the oxygen cycle of earth and holds the soil which is fit for agriculture. They provide the fertility of the area and with the excess deforestation the ecosystem can be degraded. For example timber cutting in Amazon rainforest located in Brazil leads to an action result in forest fire and the area get degraded temporarily and the damaged area will take about ten years to refurbish. The smoke and fire killed many of the species those were only found in that specific area and become extinct.

Second the poaching should be stopped, they hunt the precious animal for their valuable skin, bones, teeth and, many more organs as an artifacts. Hunting of lions for their skin and teeth. For example hunting of lions in African Savanah leads to reduction in the population of lions and increment of the other animal leading to the disturbance in the food chain and the omnivorous leads to the degradation of fertile grasslands.

In Conclusion Poaching and deforestation can affect the ecosystem and leads to the animals in endangered state which must be stopped. Particular steps should be taken to conserve these species for future generation.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an artifact' or simply 'artifacts'?
Suggestion: an artifact; artifacts
..., bones, teeth and, many more organs as an artifacts. Hunting of lions for their skin and te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 275.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07272727273 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60612374835 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3901934669 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126241756366 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476550435477 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224730892697 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766156239133 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190036484717 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.