Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books. When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie. Which do you prefer and why?
Watch the movie prior to read the book
one of the most important mechanisms of filmmaking industry is taking advantage of perfect books and turn them into a highly amazing movie. I, personally, subscribe to the idea that people should study the book which have been made the subject for a new movie before watching the film. I feel this way based on two main reasons, which I will explore in what follows.
To begin with, given the elaborate information found in the books, spectators will find a profound understanding of the movies made of the books. To clarify, obviously, the expansive sheets of a book is a highly better place for detail information of a story. using this, writers exploit this chance properly and stick to every tiny detail and explain it elaborately. By doing so, they pave the way of reaching the concept of the book easily for the readers. However, short time of a movie, regarding its common form, does not allow the producers to take audiences through every detail and the audiences have to get many notions of the films based on the implications and the connection between various scenes. Therefore, engaging in reading a book before watching its corresponding movie provides the readers to grasp every subtle concept behind the numerous actions and scenes of the movie.
To add, studying the books prior to the films made based on them, audiences will be provided with the chance to see if the film was a perfect development of the book by the director. In other words, one of most controversial debates around movies which have been prepared on the basis of a novel or a written story is the success of the director evolving the book’s thoughts professionally. In this regard, expert audiences and critics expect the directors to expand the notion of the film not just in a simple reflection or a mere copy of the story instead, they want the filmmakers to add their own thoughts and intellects to the concept of the book. Otherwise, the produced movie will be criticized intensively. Knowing this, by reading the book in advance, audiences especially those who are the fond of the movies will find the opportunity to view the movie in a critical perspective, meaning that if the director has been successful to expand the idea of the book more intellectually and create something unique using the same story narrated by words of the writer.
In short, I strongly believe that we, as audience, should read the books on which a movie has been produced. Not only does the detail provided in the book give us a helping hand to better comprehending the film but also, it prepares a suitable bed to evaluate the film's success reflecting the book's concept.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
one of the most important mechanisms of fil...
^^^
Line 6, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...lace for detail information of a story. using this, writers exploit this chance prope...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'films'' or 'film's'?
Suggestion: films'; film's
...prepares a suitable bed to evaluate the films success reflecting the books concept.
^^^^^
Line 13, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...aluate the films success reflecting the books concept.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, i feel, in short, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84649122807 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68631310267 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510964912281 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4609791548 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.125 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359227010597 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123439257811 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770905976795 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23635168705 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259881398882 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.