What incline people to do a specific work or think in a specific way? The tendency toward either ideas or facts is known as a vital factor in human impression and decisions. The question comes to mind is whether exist any priority for ideas and facts. In my opinion, people choose one of them based on their personality traits,
First, some people intrinsically prefer to spend their time on conceptual issues because their nervous system is more satisfied with this type of activity. According to some researches, only three percent of humans in all of the world have this personality type known as Logician. Philosophers, for instance, are those group who prefer ideas. Who may be interested to answer "Who is the creator of the world?" Are they people who prefer facts? Albert Einstein, the most prominent physicist of the 20th century, is also known as a Logician. The Theory of Relativity, which is one important theory in physics, is a result of Einstein’s effort, who preferred ideas rather than facts.
Second, some other groups of people are those think pursuing facts is a more effective way for the advance of human in life. Scientists, Architectures, and doctors, for instance, believe concepts are less important than facts. Statistics about personality types of humans, achieved through MBTI test, indicates that people who prefer facts in their life have the more diverse population and therefore they are capable to do a wide range of jobs. The advent of modern technology like the Internet or Other advances in medical sciences are well-known results of paying attention to facts, especially rules governing nature and employing them to overcome human problems.
In conclusion, unlike some people, who may insist on determining whether facts are less than ideas, it is my deep conviction that both of these issues in life are important and what people tend to select as a more important priority depends on their personal characteristic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e people to do a specific work or think in a specific way? The tendency toward either ideas or fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...arches, only three percent of humans in all of the world have this personality type known ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80150561349 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549689440994 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0296779285 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154919599654 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617741612294 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502778656481 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101732449844 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327177599158 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.