The social interaction has attracted been an appealing topic in the world. A minority of sociologists believe that young people nowadays have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of the communities as a whole. Personally, I bear mind a strong agreement with the belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is the development of the world. The fact is that the fast-paced changing of society goes along with higher requirements of studying and working. Therefore, it is possible for young people to have priorities on academic tasks or their careers and put much effort into them. As a result, they gradually turn into being so busy that they do not have any moment for getting involved in regulations of their living environment. This plays a crucial role in explaining their small effects on the important decisions of their communities. More importantly, it cannot be denied that the advancement of the world possesses a large opportunity for the appearances of varied types of entertainment. In this case, youngsters are inclined to be captivated and spend most of their spare time on attractive recreational activities. On that ground, needless to say, their schedules are able to be filled with studying, working, relaxing activities and there is no space for socializing. As a consequence, young people are certain to be more uncaring and represent less influence on movements of their societies. By and large, the development of the world actually separates adolescents from their duties to their communities.
On the other hand, some people might say that young people nowadays are exposed to a vast source of information. Accordingly, it is more easy for them to acknowledge the current situation and have an influence on the crucial changes in their communities. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that people are becoming more self-center, they do not want to do anything but things for their own sake, thus young people will be less concerned about their societies. Furthermore, young people are inexperienced and they have a lot of gaps in their knowledge and abilities. For this reason, it is expected to discourage them to be literally proficient and confident to make the right choices in important situations. Correspondingly, it is apparent that the communities have a tendency to confine young people’s opinions to the matter of references and ignore them. Subsequently, it is understandable that youngsters nowadays are less involved in important determinations on their societies. Beyond any doubt, the idea that the development of the world helps adolescents have more influence on their communities is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make a more appropriate decision on understanding the role of young people in the community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2531.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2510373444 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18686583895 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49377593361 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1149543895 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.458333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79166666667 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176300562591 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055312248973 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630309251428 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13383993207 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057534130594 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.