Efficiency makes a critical role in evaluation of doing things. Gaining high output after something is done could easily increase life satisfaction for people. Some people believes doing many different things at the same time produce low quality results, other would disagree. In my view, I disagree with the statement and I think doing many different thing could be done perfectly because of two important reasons.
First of all, one of the most important thing that determined achievement is to have good plan for doing it. This Plan in not completely depend on numbers of thing but based on proper managing of resources such as time, energy and etc. For example, when I was studying architecture in university, every semester we had a lot of projects to do. Some of them had a deadline dedicated by our masters. I remember many of my classmates easily getting under pressure by getting to attention to that deadline. But in that critical time, I and my friend start to managing time and create a time-table which sort priority of projects and needed time. According to that table, not only we passed all of the projects, but also getting highest scores. This example indicate doing many thing could be done along with perfect results.
Secondly, doing several things together will develop our brain ability of flexibility and attention. These abilities caused better performance in a long time and increase evaluation of doing things. For instance there is game company named Lumosity. This company created an application based on scientist researches. This game has an application which can install on personal cellphone and users should play it every day. This game contains of several levels which are different from each other and should be done at the same time. For example, one of the levels based on speed and another needs problem solving. After a while the application will provide a statement that show improvement of brain abilities. It was also sensible for me too and I think after a few weeks my brain performance developed based on playing that game. As a result we could see doing many thing together could be also beneficial.
To sum up, it’s feasible for us to do couple of things together without spoiling any of them. Provided a carefully arranged plan of time schedule and also brain performance development most of us can cope with several tasks in the meantime. I think people should sometimes do multi-tasking things in order to gain achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... for people. Some people believes doing many different things at the same time produce low qua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ee with the statement and I think doing many different thing could be done perfectly because o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...aging of resources such as time, energy and etc. For example, when I was studying archit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rding to that table, not only we passed all of the projects, but also getting highest scor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'getting the highest'.
Suggestion: getting the highest
...we passed all of the projects, but also getting highest scores. This example indicate doing man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...est scores. This example indicate doing many thing could be done along with perfect result...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...one and users should play it every day. This game contains of several levels which a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...peed and another needs problem solving. After a while the application will provide a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 832, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e developed based on playing that game. As a result we could see doing many thing ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00481927711 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6929864338 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527710843373 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7730821659 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.08 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228253778316 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677646307508 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725090893203 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161176018411 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649656235216 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.