Tpo 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Education plays a pivotal role in people's lives in recent centuries as the world has changed rapidly in many aspects and teachers are an indispensable part of education. A controversial question, which is often raised regarding this idea, whether teachers are less appreciated by society in comparison to the past or not. While some people are inclined toward the idea that teachers were more valued in the past than they were in today's world, others are against their point of view. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that teachers are not appreciated as they did in the past. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind is that since people have access to a wide range of programs that help to educate themselves, the importance of a teacher in the process of learning diminish, resulting in less respect and value they get from society. The considerable part of the duties of each teacher is educating pupils to broaden their scope of knowledge which the advent of technology gives pupils the opportunity to benefit from countless reliable resources to gain knowledge without tutoring by teachers. Therefore, pupils do not need teachers in their education they do not respect them as much as in the past when educating students was completely the responsibility of a teacher. For instance,
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that in contrast to the past that most of the students wanted to become teachers, nowadays, students tend to continue their higher education to have a decent job in other professions like being engineer, doctor, and businessman, which reduce the significance of being a teacher. Nowadays, students are money-oriented and have recognized how finding a higher paying job important in their future life, thus they are not interested in being a teacher as they know how the income of a teacher is meager, which in turn reduces the value of being a teacher. Apart from that, In today's materialistic societies people respect those who are affluent and wealthy since teachers do not earn a high income, they do not receive respect from society.
To summarize, from what has been discussed above, I firmly support the notion that teachers were more valued in the past compared with today. This is because technology has penetrated every facet of our lives especially education and we no longer need a teacher as a mentor to tutor us. Moreover, in this materialistic world, people respect more affluent people, since teachers have not much money they do not receive respect from society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich is often raised regarding this idea, whether teachers are less appreciated by...
^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to diminish'
Suggestion: to diminish
...of a teacher in the process of learning diminish, resulting in less respect and value th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97732426304 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76734493207 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9134378377 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.785714286 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 20.6045352989 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239637757254 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959703549804 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575069751729 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157710290666 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497757699169 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.