TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

tasks during a workday, while others may consider the opposite point of view. As far as I am concerned, I firmly agree with the first state. Monotonous labour could derived in a boring, open to distraction and low quality performance of the work to be done.

First of all, a work that required very few different types of tasks would give as a result a very boring job. Consequently, the workers involved in that job could feel frustrated and uncomfortable in the long term. To illustrate this argument I would bring up an old movie called "Modern Times" with Charles Chaplin. The protagonist of this movie has to perform the same task over and over during all day in a factory. Finally, he lost his mind and is fired, but he can not stop doing his task outside the factory and keep doing his task in ridiculous and funny situations. Although, this is an exaggeration of the consequence of a repetitive task in a job can help to illustrate the negative effect of a boring job.

Additionally, a boring job invites to more distractions. The performance can be jeopardised because of the lack of focus of the workers in their task. According to some research from the Faculty of Social Studies of the University of Toronto, the variation of tasks in a job keep the workers more focused. The monotone of a job provoke the mind of the worker to look for distractions. Thus, workers would be more alert and satisfied with a variation of tasks.

Finally, considering the above argument is logic to understand the final product of the job, whatever it could be, would be affected in its quality. Clearly, a worker with lack of attention and unsatisfied would not work with the dedication necessary to get a good performance. For example, today I have to perform long analysis of boring data. To keep me focus I listen to music or radio. This simple variation in my activity relax me and avoid to get me frustrated to perform this task for long period of time.

In summary, reviewing all the reason exposed above, I indeed, agree that workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tasks
tasks during a workday, while others may cons...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'derive'
Suggestion: derive
...he first state. Monotonous labour could derived in a boring, open to distraction and lo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ask in ridiculous and funny situations. Although, this is an exaggeration of the consequ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid getting'.
Suggestion: avoid getting
...e variation in my activity relax me and avoid to get me frustrated to perform this task for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 498, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rustrated to perform this task for long period of time. In summary, reviewing all the reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rkers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, if, look, may, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in summary, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70744680851 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77995130245 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497340425532 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6139017801 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284303077867 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821901479449 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108065810416 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192825431207 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160550243258 0.0645574589148 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.