Relationship development is of prominent importance in daily human life. I am of the conviction that having some long-lasting relationship with others is more important. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following passage.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that having a stable relationship helps us to trust our friends in our life problems. Establishing a relationship is not as difficult as holding a good relationship. Once you have a friend who has been with you for several years, you can easily trust him. In fact, you have experienced a lot of different situations with him or her. My own experience is compelling evidence of this concept. Five years ago, when I just arrived at university, I met my first university friend. We retained our relationship for several years and had some enjoyable and sad adventures. Since our relationship was strong; I always was able to rely on him in all of my difficult situations. On the other, my brother used to find some individual and after a while, leave them. Consequently, he couldn't trust his friends because he knows that his relation wouldn't last for a long time. As you see, having a strong relationship helps establish the foundation of trust, which benefits us in the harsh situations of life.
Another noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that practicing a long-lasting relationship with someone would help us to improve our skills for handling our future matrimony. Since marriage is a promise for both men and women to stay with each other until their demise, experiencing a long friendship relation would help us for that purpose. For example, when my father was young, he had a friend for more than three decades. Accordingly, he learned that if a relationship is going to stay stable, both persons should learn to sacrifice in their life. This helped my father to use this idea during his life with my mother. When my father and mother had a conflict about moving to a new place, my father relinquished, and kept his relationship. My father and mother relationship would have ended up to divorce if my father had not sacrificed his desire.
To put it briefly, all the counted reasons lead us to the conclusion that having a stable and durable relationship is far better than ability to make friends easily because not only during a steady relationship, you can trust your friend on life difficulties, but it would be a good practice to prepare us for our future matrimony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...s. Since our relationship was strong; I always was able to rely on him in all of my diffic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 816, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...r a while, leave them. Consequently, he couldnt trust his friends because he knows that...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 877, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ends because he knows that his relation wouldnt last for a long time. As you see, havin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, consequently, first, if, so, while, for example, i feel, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86352941176 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95047377581 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3277011545 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9545454545 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150044348943 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489346876083 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468356947567 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105724774351 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00671274499129 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.