Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?
1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one
2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research
There is no doubt about the functions and consequences of professors' desires on students can lead to selecting them for the course from the students’ standpoints. Although some students believe that the most famous professor is the better choice, in the shade of the issue which all other students like them so they should be a better one, others argue that the most pivotal role that contributes us to going to universities is improving knowledge in the shade of professors who can improve our knowledge and this event could not happen unless they have a lot of researches so rewarding for research can be known as a one important factors. My attitude toward this issue is that I really want to have my course with a rewarded professor and I will elaborate on the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the rewarded professor for outstanding research knows how to research in a better way, so most of them try to teach this ability to their students. As a matter of fact, students who have the ability to do research can better stand on their own feet when they face any problems in the future because they can better know that each issue has their solution and the only thing that they should do is researching and solving the problems. To elaborate more on this issue I can talk about one of my memories. When I was a senior, my university tried to hold a transportation planning course with two professors. One of them was a famous one and almost all of the students known how he presented the course, on the other hand, another one was known for a lot of research and he had many rewards. So students started to debate about which of them is a better one for the course. After all, some of us tried to select the famous one who known their affairs and better can tackle his work, others tried to choose another one and me was in the latter group. This course was so hard at that time and I always was at the library and tried to do my homework with researching but I learned how can solve any problems which I face without helping others. Some years later, I and one of my friends who studied at my university became coworkers, his name was Ali. He did not pass that course with my professor. In the shade of that professor, I have the ability that helps me to do my works in a better way but Ali faced many problems and my bus decided that he should be dismissed. Had I not passed that course, I could have faced many problems as my friend did.
Secondly, the professors rewarded for their research have a lot of studies on their field of research so they have a lot of knowledge that can convey them to their students. Therefore, most of the students can learn many things about that field from these kinds of gifted people. Take a student who passes the course with the professor who has many knowledge and information about their field of studies a vivid example; these kinds of students have a better chance rather than others to improve their knowledge because if they will face any issues, they can ask them from their professors so almost always students could find their answers in the shade of their professor knowledge.
All in all, selecting a professor who gains rewards from their field of research is a better way for improving students’ abilities because professors can help students not only learn how to do research on their own feet but students can also improve their knowledge on that field from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 656, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...One of them was a famous one and almost all of the students known how he presented the cou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 934, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a known'.
Suggestion: who is a known
...me of us tried to select the famous one who known their affairs and better can tackle his...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1100, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...s course was so hard at that time and I always was at the library and tried to do my homew...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...s the course with the professor who has many knowledge and information about their f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...s the course with the professor who has many knowledge and information about their field of st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, no doubt, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 86.0 43.0788530466 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2812.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 618.0 407.700716846 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5501618123 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98594081286 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47826931369 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.355987055016 0.524837075471 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 858.6 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.388259643 48.9658058833 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.0 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5263157895 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286103100808 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104797731925 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622101292287 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209407470406 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534220800843 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.002688172 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.