Workers are more satisfied when they have many different task to do during the workday than when they dpo similar task all day long.

Essay topics:

Workers are more satisfied when they have many different task to do during the workday than when they dpo similar task all day long.

Nowadays, one of the main factors for people to choose a job position or any other position that requires their involvement on a daily basis is its diversity of tasks and free will of action. By these, I mean, people like to deal with different tasks during their work time, and they tend to choose positions where they are mostly in control. Indisputably, many firms and companies, even the prestigious ones, are willing to guarantee this option to their applicants because they believe it will increase the overall job satisfaction for employees. I also find dealing with various kinds of tasks more preferable for reasons I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, diversity in tasks increases performance while working. To be more specific, people tend to show more interest in their jobs that are not routine and repetitive. Also, studies show that when individuals are dealing with a variety of assignments, their mental activity begins to increase. With this increase, they get to focus more on their tasks and hence, they will get better results. My experience in an Information Technology internship is a compelling example of this. When I started my work in that internship company, I was given regular tasks, like fixing a computer system or inserting customers' information into the database. After a while, I began to feel weary during the day and sometimes made mistakes in the simplest tasks. Then I decided to change my inputs, and therefore, I made an appointment with my supervisor. With desperation, I asked for a more diverse set of assignments, and I told him that I would prove my abilities within this opportunity. After he accepted my proposal, I felt enthusiastic toward my work and surprisingly, my performance boomed. Had I be given this option from the beginning, I would have been able to accomplish even more.

Besides, giving different tasks to workers will make them a more skillful intellectual in different areas. In other words, when employees are dealing with something new, they have to learn new things, and this way, it increases their abilities. As for me in that internship, I learned to work with much different software and work with more people. I learned how to do something efficiently, and I was an expert in communicating with the customers. As a result, when I wanted to apply for a paid job, I had a better resume and experience, and many of my applications got accepted. Also, it boosted my self-confidence, as well. Then I was a good opponent for other applicants all over the country. Had I not been given different tasks in that internship, I would not have been able to think of that great companies, as well to apply.

All in all, I firmly believe giving many different tasks to employees during the workday is beneficial on the folds of increasing job satisfaction and overall skillfulness of workers. Companies that do not include this option in their positions will lose numerous worthy applicants.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... begins to increase. With this increase, they get to focus more on their tasks an...
Line 5, column 1099, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...prisingly, my performance boomed. Had I be given this option from the beginning, I...
Line 13, column 37, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... All in all, I firmly believe giving many different tasks to employees during the workday i...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, i mean, in fact, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95608782435 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92583181179 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48502994012 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7207847214 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.32 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.04 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.32 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260555016992 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714466476105 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620650967899 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174375018261 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292702879426 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.