You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or club. Do you agree or disagree that a person’s honesty is the most important thing to consider in deciding whom to vote for? Use reasons and examples to support your position.
That a leader’s skills and qualities to guide an organization are important functions which can bring about “success” is obvious for everyone. Although some people think that being honest is not critical in leadership, I, personally, do believe that there are few criteria more important than honesty for a competent leader because of two reasons which are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, being honest is the most important “building block” in a leader-follower relationship, which can help to make a mutual trust among the members of an organization. As Thomas Jefferson once said, “Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom.” Therefore, it is evident that the more honest a person is in his or her life, the better mentality people possibly have about their performance. For instance, when a leader speaks with their followers in the face of problems instead of hiding the truth, others who follow the leader will be encouraged to be honest such that a relationship based on mutual trust will be created among them. In such trustworthy atmosphere, all people can express their real opinions, thoughts, and new ideas; thus there is no reason for dishonesty. Undoubtedly, they might have more opportunities to become successful than organizations in which honesty is ignored. If honesty does not be considered as the first priority, however, everyone may tell many a white lie without paying attention to their negative effects. As a matter of fact, this mistrust may lead to the destruction of integrity and failure.
Equally important is to take full responsibility for wrong decisions and poor choices. Taking responsibility is the highest mark of great leaders. Unfortunately, this is a missing link in many organizations. In most cases, a leader denies any responsibility for several reasons, one of which is afraid of becoming criticized by others. Indeed, a leader who is honest has the courage of taking responsibility for any decision and risk. With little doubt, such a “committed and responsible” leader not only can be an excellent role model for his or her followers but increase the possibility of success for the organization as well. If an individual is responsible regarding his or her mistakes, they will try not to repeat them again. Since they learn valuable experience the hard way and all these are by virtue of being honest. On the other hand, rarely can be guaranteed the success of an organization in which leaders hold others responsible whenever anything goes wrong in a project rather than themselves.
In light of these critical merits, I strictly agree that honesty is of great importance. A mutual trust and responsibility can improve the influence of a leadership. A leader who is honest can bring diverse successes for an organization, and therefore the presence of them is vital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to everyone'.
Suggestion: obvious to everyone
... can bring about 'success' is obvious for everyone. Although some people think that being ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...struction of integrity and failure. Equally important is to take full responsibilit...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ision and risk. With little doubt, such a 'committed and responsible' l...
^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...herefore the presence of them is vital.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a matter of fact, in most cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23706896552 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24892509435 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532327586207 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0832540333 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203805696623 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062944783095 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517873816845 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141357503095 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446088585248 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.