about mandatory elections

Essay topics:

about mandatory elections

The lecture and the reading consider the issue related to mandatory voting.The passage explains several positive sides of a low, that makes it required for every adult citizen of a government to vote, but the professor rebuts it.

Firstly, the author of an article claim, that actually the citizens give the rights to authorities to govern them, so if a person doesn’t go to an election, the government loses its legitimacy upon him or her. Although the professor of the lecture has another significant point of view. He claims, that a small amount of voters increases its quality. Fastidious smart citizens, who truly want to vote, make a better choice of an authority, which will govern well for every dweller of a country.

The second idea from a passage states, that voting is like taxation should be a compulsory part of a nation is because the nation as a whole relies and depends on every citizen. Although the lecturer counters this point by mention, that not giving a vote means disagreement with every candidate, it is also a choice. Lecturer, in turn, illustrates the situation, like if a half of the people didn’t pay taxes, the government would run out of money, although if a part of citizens didn’t take part in election nothing would happen, the government would successfully continuer to exist and do the job, according to the professor.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...r the issue related to mandatory voting.The passage explains several positive sides...
^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t loses its legitimacy upon him or her. Although the professor of the lecture has anothe...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91774891775 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72382796261 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4393916234 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427278848806 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140000465741 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246267860918 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0323826946281 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263717309147 0.0443174109184 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.