This set of materials deal with the subject of "Globalization" advantages and disadvantages. The reading presents the benefits of Globalization, while the lecturer strongly contradicts of the reading.
First of all, according to the reading, globalization helps nations to increase their economic status. For example, Southeast Asia people live more comfortably because of globalization. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that depending on big economies can cause troubles. For instance, an economic crisis was happened at United States in 2008. Although it happened at United States, so many Europe countries affected from this financial situation.
Secondly, the reading states that globalization creates competition and it forces the producers to produce more qualified goods. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that countries like USA started to open their factories in other countries because it is cheaper. That is why, it makes the decrease of jobs in the United States.
Finally, the reading claims that globalization puts pressure on governments to make safer and healthier choices and to give them restrictions about environmental issues. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that in contrast, companies make less healthy choices in order to diminish the cost and sell more goods to overseas countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affected from this financial situation. Secondly, the reading states that global...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77450980392 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28570353971 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6590504611 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0637554334317 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0205863435212 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390592582038 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417487525258 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041170987284 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.59 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.