In this set of materials, the reading passage show a point of view about US education and provides chronological points to show how it works. The lecture says the negatives points around that US scholar system.
.
The author classifies the grad school system according to the age of student in three grades. First is primary grade or elementary grade which includes grades 1 to 5 or 6 including kindergarten, generally taught by one teacher. Intermediate grades consist of grade 6 or 7 in which different subjects are taught by the different teaches. Also in grade 9 or 10 known as secondary grade, subjects are taught by subject specialists in specific class of each subject for fifty minutes. Finally, the students become eligible for admission in secondary school diploma also known as high school diploma.
The speaker explains the negative effect of grad school system. First of all, it does not consider the differences in between individual learner, because it might be possible that some students are not socially or mentally matured for school at age of 4 or 5 year.
Secondly, if the student's performance has not reached the minimum requirement, then he will have to study again which will make him bored. Furthermore, grad school system concentrates on group performance, not on individual's performance or achievements. That is why the best students have to wait for new material for study whereas the slow learner can not be in rhythm with the trend.
The lecture concludes that clearly the grad system must be reviewed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... points around that US scholar system. . The author classifies the grad school ...
^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ge of 4 or 5 year. Secondly, if the students performance has not reached the minimum...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ncentrates on group performance, not on individuals performance or achievements. That is wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0905511811 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8346567233 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6094048123 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273874339582 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999941390686 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726780114721 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130372340808 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728063640407 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.