Integrated TPO 42

Essay topics

The reading passage mentions that glass in one of the most problematic things that could lead bird being injured by them. The professor's lecture deals with the same issue. He states that the argument in the reading are not convincing and expresses three specific reasons to underscore his standpoint.
First, the reading asserts that one-way glass in a good alternative which helps birds imagine that glass is a kind of barrier. Nonetheless, the professor refutes this point. He explains that one-way glass reflex light. Hence, it acts like mirror and this solution is as bad as regular usage of glass.

Second, the passage addresses another idea that utilization of colorful design such as strip painting can be useful. The lecturer repudiates this point. He says that as reading clearly states, such a design needs an opening in the building. Hence, birds imagine can be easily caught by flying through them. Also, if the size of opening such as windows decreases another problem would stands out. Indeed, room would be too dark for their dwellers to live.

Third, the article mentions that magnetic field is another characteristic of birds that worth to work on. However, the professor in the listening rebuts this point by describing magnetic field features. Indeed, this feature helps bird flying to long distances. For instance, before winter, birds begin to migrate from cold to the warm places. Albeit, birds use this feature to travel so far, they use their visibility and lights to travel through short distances such as moving from one part of a town to the other side.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'stand'
Suggestion: stand
...windows decreases another problem would stands out. Indeed, room would be too dark for...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, third, well, for instance, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04562737643 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42452613849 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2690562938 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7222222222 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6111111111 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387796535544 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101931173276 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068618964721 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208900678232 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556700853233 0.0443174109184 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.