in many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages.
The article states that working as a team is more beneficial comparing to working individually, and it counts three main reasons for its decision. However, the lecturer completely disagrees with these reasons; he rejects all the ideas in the passage by giving an example of a company which monitored its team projects efficiency. The professors reasons are discribed in the following.
First, the reading claims that a "team" has a greater range of competencies comparing to each of the individuals in that team, wich will definitely be profitable for projects. However, The professors refutes this idea by stating that in teams, normally, some team members get a free ride and do not contribute in the team's tasks. This will gradually decrease the contribution of the members who work well insomuch as the recognition goes to the whole team and their efforts will overlooked.
Second, the authors states that teams come up with creative ideas, and a team can undertake these ideas more easily than individuals. However, the professors do not concede this statement inasmuch as he refers to the company in his example that the "consensus" was the main problem for them. They had to hold many meetings in order to move the project forward.
Third, the article agrees that team memebrs can suggest their own ideas and solutions which leads to their recognition by the whole team. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes this idea. According to his example, since there are some influencers in projects, usually, the ideas of others will be ignored and droped by these influencers and even other contributors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'reason'.
Suggestion: reason
...eam projects efficiency. The professors reasons are discribed in the following. Fi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng. First, the reading claims that a 'team' has a greater range of...
^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'overlook'
Suggestion: overlook
...o the whole team and their efforts will overlooked. Second, the authors states that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, nevertheless, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24809160305 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99908936706 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0545841263 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142280762385 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542674913668 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420688328847 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905763191955 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223878010439 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.