The 20th century saw the use of fossil fuels such as coal, gas, and oil as the predominant sources of energy for our society. But, with their use have come a number of serious problems, such as their limited availability and the question of global warming. Nuclear energy must be seen as the solution, as the next logical step in the evolution of energy production.
First, the fuel that powers nuclear power plants is cheap compared to the fossil fuels we currently use to supply most of our energy needs. Because it exists in such abundant supplies, a unit of fuel used in nuclear power plants costs about 7 dollars. This unit produces the same amount of energy as 84 dollars of oil or 29 dollars of gas. The potential savings to consumers is enormous.
Second, despite what some may believe, the process of creating nuclear energy is relatively safe. Though production involves large amounts of dangerous radiation, nuclear power plants incorporate an array of measures to ensure that this radiation is contained and poses no danger to the public. Elaborate equipment is used throughout nuclear plants to monitor and control all processes. Furthermore, this machinery will shut down under any abnormal circumstances to prevent a catastrophe.
Third, the hazardous radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants can be effectively managed. Fuel reprocessing is one measure often employed. This process takes the waste produced in plants and reuses it. It draws out 25% more energy from the original fuel source and reduces the amount of high-level waste, the most radioactive and therefore dangerous, by 80%. Consequently, the remaining waste possesses much less radioactivity and is even easier to dispose of.
The article states that nuclear energy is a solution to the fossil fuels such as coal and gas that are limited and bring us many problems such as global warming and provides three reasons of support. However the professor explains that the problems that the author mentioned are well known and clear but the nuclear energy is not as good as author mentiond and the reasons for replacing nuclear energy are wrong and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the nuclear power is cheaper than the fuel energy. The professor refutes this point by saying that creating nuclear energy needs far more time and spending such a time on creating this kind of energy cannot be a cheap process. He states that countries need some companies to manage to produce nuclear energy which cause that nuclear energy become really expensive.
Second, the reading avers that process of creating nuclear energy is safer. However, the professor declares that accidents always happen and no one can stop them to accure. According to professor creating nuclear power bring a lot of financial damage to the companies and countries.
Third, the article posits that the waste which are produce in generating nuclear power can be managed. The professor opposes this point by explaining that managing the produces waste is not as easy as the author mentioned. We also learn that the wastes which are produced in creating nuclear power are the material which used for weapons and are really dangerous fot the society. These waste should be placed deep on the ground and should remain there for 1000 of years which is really difficult.
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 60
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline. One hypothesis i 80
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. In your opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (someone you work closely with)? 70
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine, wh 83
- The article states that the zebra mussel is spreading and it is not possible to stop this invasion and it poses a serious threst to freshwater population and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that controversy of what you r 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... and provides three reasons of support. However the professor explains that the problem...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'kind of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239726027397 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.202054794521 0.158904122519 127% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0993150684932 0.0723426182421 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0513698630137 0.0435111971325 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.013698630137 0.0277247811725 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106164383562 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0650684931507 0.0370669169778 176% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.25581782278 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0205479452055 0.0208969081088 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119863013699 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171232876712 0.0158828679856 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0239726027397 0.0114777025283 209% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1638.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 275.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95636363636 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.403636363636 0.374372842146 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272727272727 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156363636364 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0727272727273 0.113142543107 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25581782278 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501818181818 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.508110227 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9166666667 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.206448789 49.3711431718 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 50.1893939394 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.53846153846 1.90840788429 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376367892818 0.549887131256 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143862394896 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0877176448561 0.0787303798458 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645701690672 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112637682923 0.139662658121 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17991756875 0.266732575781 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100509088572 0.103435571967 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388913027102 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0693872840083 0.0530846634433 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271296393699 0.40443939384 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100413063462 0.0528353158467 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.