the passage and the lecture are discussing a device called TED for saving endangered sea turtles
Both the author and the lecturer discuss on a device for saving sea turtles called TED. The passage claims that TED is not effective and it is more disadvantageous and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas implausible and presents some evidence to refute each of the author's points.
First, the author argues that based on shrimpers experience turtles are trapped only rarely and using TED is so much costing the shrimpers. On the contrary, the lecturer opposes this point by highlighting the fact that it might be true that turtles are trapped rarely in the nets of each shrimpers boats, but there are 1000 of shrimpers boats on the sea and accidentally thousands of sea turtles are trapped. she announces that the population of sea turtles are already too small. Therefore, this is a significant number among sea turtles.
Second, the article posits that other alternative methods to protects sea turtles are more beneficial including limiting the time that shrimp boats are allowed to keep their nets underwater. In contrast, the professor dismisses this point by saying that time limits is a good idea but only a theoretically good idea. she states that it is impossible to impose this limits on 1000 boats on the sea and sea officers cannot monitor them all. However, TED is easier to impose and its presence can be checked on each boat that leaves port.
Finally, the passage states that TEDs are not effective for larger species of sea turtles. Conversely, the lecturer counters this idea by bringing up the fact that producing appropriate TEDs for larger turtles is not a problem and they can be easily created. Thus, when these types of TEDs are produced, inefficiency for huge species of sea turtles will not be a problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-27 | mehrnaz.asadi | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects of the way young people behave. Agree or disagree? 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. the assay announced cloud seeding is effective in reducing hail creation and provided 3 reason and examples to support thi 80
- the passage and the lecture are discussing a device called TED for saving endangered sea turtles 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...y thousands of sea turtles are trapped. she announces that the population of sea tu...
^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...dea but only a theoretically good idea. she states that it is impossible to impose ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60959767014 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0572683078 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403889606484 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149954014282 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163753599208 0.0662205650399 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257796555575 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136948139698 0.0443174109184 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.