Plain of Jars building
Both the reading and the lecture are about the possible explanations for a mystery site called Plain of Jars. Actually, the writer is proposing three theories regarding the purpose of building this site. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of theories presented in the passage. Having categorically rejected them, the lecturer explains the reasons.
To begin with, both the article and the speaking put forth to the idea of fermentation goals of building this site. In this vein, the writer disputes that this area is built in obedience of a king's order to ferment a special drink for their celebrations. This specific argument is challenged by the professor. He is of the opinion that since there exist pots made of clay for the aim of fermentation, and also producing jars from stone was a time consuming, tedious and expensive process, therefore, contemplating them as a fermentation jar does not seem feasible. Especially, when those clay pots worked out as effective as stone ones.
Secondly, the author argues that since the location experienced dry climate as much as rainy one, and also, the site is near trading routs, the jars may have been built to contain water for traders in dry seasons. Contrastly, the author opposes this notion by averting that although the site is adjacent to trading passages, however the routs are near streams and rivers which can provide the required water for travelers. Consequently, the travelers did not have to build an additional source of water by these jars.
Finally, the passage indicates that as many jewelry and tools have been found from the site, it may have been the relics of a burial site and the jars served as tombs. On the other hand, the professor's stance is that burial monuments required covers in order to protect tombs from weather or even thieves. However, whereas the jars are left without any covering, they cannot be considered as tombs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fermenting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: fermenting
... is built in obedience of a kings order to ferment a special drink for their celebrations....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...served as tombs. On the other hand, the professors stance is that burial monuments require...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, finally, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92424242424 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6146949986 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3127773146 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06452816374 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178348626261 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482174456543 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470855213698 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937445754875 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123598564731 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.