Rembrandt's Portrait
The passage introduces the following facts about the Rembrandt's Portrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnet; Inconsistent dressing, error in lighting, and the wood panel that the painting made on was glued together. These are not the characteristics of Rembrandt's paintings and agrees that the portrait was not his and hence removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt's paintings. However, the lecture deny's and provides evidence that the portrait was his but it was modified later on.
First, the women in the lecture says that, when the painting was X-ray scanned and analysed it came out that the black fur on the painting was added later after 100 years to increase the value of the painting of the aristocratic lady, which was marked as a inconsistency of Rembrandt's paintings because the women was wearing the white linen cap which only servants would wear and luxury fur collar that no servants could afford.
Furthermore, Rembrandt's was a master of painting light and shadow. The passage suggests that there must be partial shadow on the face if the light was illuminated from below. But the lecture counters it by saying the cloak was added after the painting was created and hence justifies the illuminance on face.
Finally, the passage suggests that the painting was made on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together, which contradicts with the nature of Rembrandt who liked to paint on the single wood. However, lecture says that several wood panels were added on the side of the paintings to make it giant. Also the lecture adds that the wood used for the painting was same as the wood used to draw his self portrait with a hat.
Although, there were problems with the paintings that suggested the painting could not be the work of Rembrandt and even the work was removed from the catalog of Rembrandt's paintings, proper analysis of the painting showed that the painting was indeed made my Rembrandt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sabindawadi | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Suthasith | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | alta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | aldo.vega05@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | gkb | 60 | view |
- “Scientific theories, which most people consider as ‘fact,’ almost invariablyprove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information describedas ‘factual’ with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.” 82
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 66
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 70
- It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. 50
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specifc reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: Woman
...t the Rembrandts Portrait of an Elderly Women in a White Bonnet; Inconsistent dressin...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inting made on was glued together. These are not the characteristics of Rembrandt...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... aristocratic lady, which was marked as a inconsistency of Rembrandts paintings b...
^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...side of the paintings to make it giant. Also the lecture adds that the wood used for...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91185410334 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53656840734 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455927051672 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.5442804358 49.2860985944 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.909090909 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154457096722 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086457550698 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812489020814 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109701780376 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827668494869 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.