The solution to most problems that societies confront is a higher level of political sophistication that results from more education When people have the facts about the issues they will be clearer thinkers and better citizens Most people depend on broadc

The reading passage posits that most of the problems in a society can be hindered with high education. However, professor contradicts the statement using three reasons. To elaborate one has to go through scrupulous discussion below.
Firstly, not all educated people are open to suggestions and various beliefs. It is visible that the people those are less educated are ready to accept the different opinions. If this the case even though these is a lot of information spread about the current situation which they are not ready to accept and take in the situation would be further deteriorated.
In addition, the particular group is not ready to accepts the facts that are against their beliefs. They would like to absorb the statements that are in compatible with their beliefs and would leave behind the facts that are not convenient which would thwart a lot of valuable information helping them to get an idea of situation that is actually happening in the current society.
Furthermore, the political parties want the educated people to leave in fear so that they can take control of the whole situation managing on their own without any rival coming in their way. If this the case society will stand still at a place where it is right now with corruption and cheating going on around even though there is a lot of development. They mainly depend on broadcast which is telecasted in the news channels and their failure to check the actual facts because of their busy nature will further prevent the growth.
To conclude, the statement is considered untenable with various questions and unwarranted assumptions. This can be considered true only if the professor provides answers to the above assumptions. At this point it is considered dubious and almost falls flat.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'accept'.
Suggestion: accept
...n, the particular group is not ready to accepts the facts that are against their belief...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'facts'.
Suggestion: facts
...channels and their failure to check the actual facts because of their busy nature will furth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, as to, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99662162162 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67289090342 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8051992397 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155729162923 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498851745868 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446502783879 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789806315812 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450029454564 0.0443174109184 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.