stone balls
The reading indicates that stone balls have been formed in round shape for several purpose and it lists three factors supporting these theories. However, the speaker finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refuts all three factors.
First, the author argues that they were used as the weapons for hunting or fighting. due to the holes and some grooves an the surface of them. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this idea by standing that arrows were used as the weapons too, and very well carvaed of the stone balls does not damage to use for fighting or hunting.
Second, the reading passage points out that those stones balls were used as a rudimanrary system of weights to measure how much the weights of the grains and other foods is. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this facts and contends that the size of them may be the same but because the different density among sands, grains and court site their weights is various. Consequently, two ball stones with the same size have different wights. Due to this reason, the speakers rejects this theory.
Last but not least, the author proposes that they have another different utility. its skillfuly design was marked by social status of their owners. on the other hand, the speaker dismisses this rreason too and asserts that some balls have statistic symbol, hence, when the high ranking people died they buried with their possestions. In the other words, no ball found in tumbs or graves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun purpose seems to be countable; consider using: 'several purposes'.
Suggestion: several purposes
...lls have been formed in round shape for several purpose and it lists three factors supporting t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...as the weapons for hunting or fighting. due to the holes and some grooves an the su...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ting. due to the holes and some grooves an the surface of them. In contrast, the s...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: an; the
...ting. due to the holes and some grooves an the surface of them. In contrast, the speak...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...he contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this facts and contends that the size of the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...at they have another different utility. its skillfuly design was marked by social s...
^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...arked by social status of their owners. on the other hand, the speaker dismisses t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83399209486 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14928921755 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596837944664 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5525098539 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0769230769 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27515709193 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096165095242 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116030454349 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161223469898 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410516808043 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.