Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the free trade which is the policy where the administration do not restrict the country to import or export goods to other nations. The author of the reading states that there advantages of free trade. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions free trade does not benefit the nation as well as people and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that with free trade there will be the proper utilization of resources and production in economy creating employment opportunities to people. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the author’s position. He contends this only prosper the developed country and neglects the poor one. This eventually leads to the unbalanced economic development.
According to the writing, we can obtain good in cheaper prices resulting high standard of living and international prosperity. The speaker on other hand points out that it only favors the rich nation. In addition, core and developing countries manufacture good at rock bottom price but they does not participate in economic benefit . Hence, the standard of living does not go up.
Also, the reading passage notes that once the free trade is implement and expand globally, then the demand will increases. This requires more labor forces in production and as a result employment opportunities will be created. The professor rebuts the argument, he says this leads to the negative effect in employment. He puts forth the idea that manufacturing company will employ labor off seas labor even in the cheapest sum. Therefore, native country will have the detrimental effect on employment.
As we can see the writer and speaker holds very different views on free trade. The professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es that there advantages of free trade. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions free tr...
^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not benefit the nation as well as people and attacks each of the claims made in t...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...ture good at rock bottom price but they does not participate in economic benefit . H...
^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...does not participate in economic benefit . Hence, the standard of living does not ...
^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...d expand globally, then the demand will increases. This requires more labor forces in pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e negative effect in employment. He puts forth the idea that manufacturing compan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17288135593 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74729264434 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1316393442 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3157894737 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110354611625 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345515533547 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345488040991 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569982614384 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241939867532 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.