TOEFL T P O 19 - Integrated Writing Task

Essay topics:

TOEFL T P O 19 - Integrated Writing Task

The passage discusses that a new method for concincing people to buy products is buzzinh. In this way, the companies hire people, buzzers, who introduce products to people. The passage provides three reasons to support that this strategy is a bad idea. However, the man in the lecture rejects all these reasons.
First, the pasaage suggests that people must know about the identity of buzzer people. Also, passage states that if we do not know the buzzer people, they will give us incorrect information. In contrast, the man rejects this idea by explaining that companies just hire the people who used from the products and they are satisfied with the quality of products. As a result, every thing we know from the buzzers are true.
Second, the text claims that if buzzers pretend they are just privte individuals, the consumers will listen to their sendorsements less critically. In spite of this idea, the man asserts that people ask a lot of questions about products' quality, price and othet things from buzzers and if buzzers do not give good answers they may refuse to buy the product.
Third, the reading argues that the harmful effect of buzzing is that there is a ossibility they have bad impacts on social relationships. While the man rejects this idea by explaining that the bad products of the company have nothing to do with buzzers and they just promote the products and people cannot blame the buzzers. As a result, the fault is on companies not on buzzers.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mful effect of buzzing is that there is a ossibility they have bad impacts on soc...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, in contrast, as a result, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83399209486 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4742893583 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501976284585 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7956771965 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0769230769 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.