TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri
The writing and the lecturer are both about employment. The writer talks about a mandatory policy requiring workers to work a four-day week and its benefit to the economy, however, the Professor disagrees with the claim made by the author.
First of all. the writer in the passage states that the shortened work week would increase the company profits because employees would feel more rested. The lecturer challenges this, he believes that a four-day week will not decrease the company profit, rather it will cost the company more money by employing new staff who will need training, health benefits, new computers and even office space.
Secondly, the author in the passage says the primary benefit of offering the four-day week option to employees for the country as a whole would be to reduce unemployment rate, conversely, the lecturer disagrees stating that this option would not decrease unemployment rate, instead it will bring about staff working overtime, furthermore, it will increase the company expectation of its workers as they will expect the workers to carry out the five-day task they would normally do in four days, therefore no new staff will be employed.
In addition, the author believes that the four-day week will give the employees more free time, which could be used to improve the quality of their lives. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that it would rather have a negative effect on the quality of their lives by reducing job stability, career advancement as they could be passed over in times of promotion because employers will choose a staff who is always available to ensure continuous coverage and consistent supervision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...-day week and its benefit to the economy,however, the Professor disagrees with the claim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... made by the author. First of all. the writer in the passage states that the s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18450184502 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64381294188 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523985239852 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 155.22866198 49.2860985944 315% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.625 110.228320801 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.875 21.698381199 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 7.06452816374 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460433142602 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181155580717 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138341861658 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269280819537 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981347032181 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.3589403974 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.